In the case of 2002 Hit And Run Case, Maharashtra Government has appealed against Salman Khan acquittal to Supreme Court. On behave of State Government, Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi Highlighted the drawbacks of Bombay High Court on Salman khan acquitted. Rohatgi said that Court did not believed the statement of the most important witness Police Constable Ravindra Patil. But Suddenly after 13 years, a man claimed that he was driving the car that night and influenced the court. Rohatgi told the court, 'On the Night of incident, Salman was in a bar around 1:30 and the manager and the waited confirmed that he was drunk. Around 2:20, Parking man of a 5 star hotel saw him sitting at the driver seat that night. Injured 4 people also said that Salman was driving the car. These all points were also there apart from Ravindra Patil's statement, by this only Salman Khan was punished by the Session Court. But High Court did not found any evidence relevant.' Rohatgi stating Salman Driver statement wrong and said, Where was this man from 2002 to 2015? Salman Khan, Ravidra Patil and who made Salman Khan escape from the accident spot Fernandez aka Commandar never talked about this man before. How is it possible that this man is anaware about the case? Why didn't he came forward from 13 years. Rohatgi said that Session Court was aware of all the facts, that's why Session Court did not considered the statement of the Driver. But High Court did not do that. Rohatagi question on Salman Khan also, he said, 'Salman ran away from the accident spot. He did not came in front of the police and then was seen at lawyer's office. That time alcohol content was found in his blood.' The Supreme Court will hear the Maharashtra government's appeal next on 12 February